Already
at age 13 or 14 I had developed a welldeserved reputation for being
an eccentric  even in my own family. One of the reasons was that
I had put a book with logarithm tables on my Christmas wish list.
An even better reason was that after I got it, I used to bring it
with me when we went for a walk.
My interest must have been triggered by a book on the history of
mathematics, probably Bell's "Men
of Mathematics". I came to realise what heroic efforts
astronomers and navigators must have put into sheer number "crunching"
before logarithms were discovered, and what a revolution logarithms
must have meant to their professions. I was especially impressed
with the work of Johannes
Kepler, who divided his time between saving his mother from
being burned as a witch (or heretic?) and calculating the orbits
of the planets and deriving some simple laws for their motion from
Tycho
Brahe's long lists of observations.
The magic of logarithms was that they transformed a multiplication
into an addition, and a division into a subtraction. It all stems
from a basic rule in algebra:
a^{m}
* a^{n} = a^{m+n}
The trick is this: If we want to multiply two numbers
X and Y without going through the drudgery of actually
performing the calculation, which can be considerable if we are
dealing with, say, two 10digit numbers, we just need to express
X and Y in the form a^{m} and a^{n},
respectively. Then we calculate m + n and look up to which
number a^{m+n} corresponds.
Originally, a^{m} just meant "multiply
a with itself m times" (or m1
times if you want to be pedantic), so that for instance 5^{3}
= 5 * 5 * 5 = 125. But mathematicians soon discovered that the "exponents"
m and n did not necessarily have to be integers. For
instance, if m = ½ and n = ½, then the
formula above says that a^{½}*a^{½}
= a. But that by definition means that a^{½}
is the square root of a. Further extensions can be made so
that m or n in the formula above can be any real number
(actually any complex number, but let us not go into that).
Logarithm tables commonly use 10 as a base, corresponding
to the number a above. To calculate, say, 2*3 with the means
of logarithms (this is just for the purpose of the discussion 
I know the result!), you look up the logarithms of 2 and 3 to base
10 in the table: 0.30103 and 0.47712. You add these and obtain 0.77815.
In the table, that corresponds to the number 6.  Voilá,
you have multiplied two numbers without actually performing the
calculation!
When I learned this, I thought: Great! I will memorize
logarithms and become a master arithmetician! Actually, what I was
proposing to do, without realizing it, was to memorize the slide
rule! My enthusiasm soon waned, when I discovered that I would either
have to learn a very large number of logarithms by heart or be prepared
to do a lot of interpolation between logarithms in a table with
large holes in it.
As an aside, I really was
considered a wizard with numbers in school. Once, my math teacher
needed the square of 155 and, intending it as a joke, turned to
me: "Zenker, how much is that. You mean you don't know?"
And I immediately replied: "Sure, it's 24025." He responded:
"You are from Mars!"  (The "secret" was that
I knew that I needed 15*15 + 15 and then had to append 25 at the
end.  All squares of numbers ending in 5 are like that: (10n +
5)^{2} = 100n^{2} + 100n + 25 = (n^{2} +
n)*100 + 25. In fact, I could even have used it to find 15*15 =
225, if I had not already memorized that.)
When logarithms were discovered (some would say "invented")
by John Napier in 1614, the discovery was already "in the air",
so to speak. Trigonometric identities had been used
for several decades to transform division into subtraction. A Swiss
mathematician and clockmaker, Joost Bürgi, discovered logarithms
independently of Napier but did not publish his results until 1620.
 Interestingly, logarithms were not
recognized as exponents of base numbers until much later in
the century.
A key figure in the development of logarithm tables
was Henry Briggs. He quickly recognized
the significance of Napier's work and compiled a table to the
base of 10 as early as 1617. This led to the rapid spread of the
use of logarithms in Europe in the following years among navigators,
land surveyors and astronomers. Of particular interest, perhaps,
Kepler's discovery
of the Third Law of Planetary Motion was undoubtedly related to
the discovery of logarithms, and Kepler dedicated his Ephemerides
in 1620 to Napier, who had died in 1617.
One can imagine the joy of the likes of Kepler, when
the necessity to perform complicated calculations by hand was reduced
by an order of magnitude. At the same time, one has to admire the
determination and perseverance of the mathematicians who compiled
the first tables of logarithms, also by hand. The drudgery of the
work must have been incredible, while errors could hardly be tolerated.
Today it is fashionable among scientists to call themselves "workers",
but in those days the term carried real meaning!
"Books"
start page
